Image

Invisible Sun feed

King of the indoor jungle
Post Reply
User avatar
TheCloudyChef
Registered User
Posts: 1013
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2020 2:57 pm
Has thanked: 597 times
Been thanked: 720 times
Status: Offline

Re: Invisible Sun feed

Post by TheCloudyChef »

IMO wrote:
TheCloudyChef wrote:
Wed Jun 23, 2021 4:53 pm
IMO wrote: Oh now your teasing me , I sooo want one of these
Look gd dont they ! And you could hang your choices of supplemental lighting in the middle.

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Yeah liked them soon as they came out wish I’d taken up the discount offer at the start of the year but didn’t have the funds, that’s only thing stopping me now, 2 of these in a 1.2 would be awesome
In a 1.2 u say
Stop putting thoughts in my head lol the misses will go mad if I now swung to these lol

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk

These users thanked the author TheCloudyChef for the post:
Invisible Sun (Wed Jun 23, 2021 5:48 pm)

London Seed Centre   The Cannabis Experts - You Tube
User avatar
IMO
Known User
Posts: 2893
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2020 8:01 am
Location: Northwest Uk
Has thanked: 2241 times
Been thanked: 2821 times
Status: Offline

Re: Invisible Sun feed

Post by IMO »

TheCloudyChef wrote:
Wed Jun 23, 2021 5:25 pm
IMO wrote:
TheCloudyChef wrote:
Wed Jun 23, 2021 4:53 pm
Look gd dont they ! And you could hang your choices of supplemental lighting in the middle.

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Yeah liked them soon as they came out wish I’d taken up the discount offer at the start of the year but didn’t have the funds, that’s only thing stopping me now, 2 of these in a 1.2 would be awesome
In a 1.2 u say
Stop putting thoughts in my head lol the misses will go mad if I now swung to these lol

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
If I remember right 2x these are designed for a 1.2x1.2 so in a 2.4 you would have 4x I’m just wondering if 2x of these would be a huge difference from my 4r I wouldn’t expect it to be twice the yield but it would kinda have to add half or it wouldn’t be worth the extra cost of light and the extra 250w of energy.
These users thanked the author IMO for the post:
Invisible Sun (Wed Jun 23, 2021 5:48 pm)

User avatar
Invisible Sun
Posts: 746
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 12:19 am
Has thanked: 333 times
Been thanked: 972 times
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Invisible Sun feed

Post by Invisible Sun »

The Aspie Toker wrote:
Tue Jun 22, 2021 11:54 pm
Invisible Sun wrote:
Wed Jun 16, 2021 9:40 pm
Image
It can double up as a tampon holder.
😍 beautiful
These users thanked the author Invisible Sun for the post:
Josh (Tue Jun 29, 2021 10:08 am)
For further information on our products please visit our website www.invisiblesunled.co.uk

User avatar
Invisible Sun
Posts: 746
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 12:19 am
Has thanked: 333 times
Been thanked: 972 times
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Invisible Sun feed

Post by Invisible Sun »

IMO wrote:
Wed Jun 23, 2021 5:35 pm
TheCloudyChef wrote:
Wed Jun 23, 2021 5:25 pm
IMO wrote:
Yeah liked them soon as they came out wish I’d taken up the discount offer at the start of the year but didn’t have the funds, that’s only thing stopping me now, 2 of these in a 1.2 would be awesome
In a 1.2 u say
Stop putting thoughts in my head lol the misses will go mad if I now swung to these lol

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
If I remember right 2x these are designed for a 1.2x1.2 so in a 2.4 you would have 4x I’m just wondering if 2x of these would be a huge difference from my 4r I wouldn’t expect it to be twice the yield but it would kinda have to add half or it wouldn’t be worth the extra cost of light and the extra 250w of energy.
Do you have 1 x 4R ? If so , 2 of these is far superior and you would expect to double the yield from 1 x 4R

User avatar
Invisible Sun
Posts: 746
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 12:19 am
Has thanked: 333 times
Been thanked: 972 times
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Invisible Sun feed

Post by Invisible Sun »

Image
These users thanked the author Invisible Sun for the post:
ILlegalyGrowing (Wed Jun 23, 2021 7:15 pm)

User avatar
IMO
Known User
Posts: 2893
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2020 8:01 am
Location: Northwest Uk
Has thanked: 2241 times
Been thanked: 2821 times
Status: Offline

Re: Invisible Sun feed

Post by IMO »

Invisible Sun wrote:
Wed Jun 23, 2021 5:49 pm
IMO wrote:
Wed Jun 23, 2021 5:35 pm
TheCloudyChef wrote:
Wed Jun 23, 2021 5:25 pm
In a 1.2 u say
Stop putting thoughts in my head lol the misses will go mad if I now swung to these lol

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
If I remember right 2x these are designed for a 1.2x1.2 so in a 2.4 you would have 4x I’m just wondering if 2x of these would be a huge difference from my 4r I wouldn’t expect it to be twice the yield but it would kinda have to add half or it wouldn’t be worth the extra cost of light and the extra 250w of energy.
Do you have 1 x 4R ? If so , 2 of these is far superior and you would expect to double the yield from 1 x 4R
Yes currently got a 4r in there wow interesting that’s food for thought double yield would be nice.

User avatar
Invisible Sun
Posts: 746
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 12:19 am
Has thanked: 333 times
Been thanked: 972 times
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Invisible Sun feed

Post by Invisible Sun »

IMO wrote:
Wed Jun 23, 2021 6:01 pm
Invisible Sun wrote:
Wed Jun 23, 2021 5:49 pm
IMO wrote:
Wed Jun 23, 2021 5:35 pm


If I remember right 2x these are designed for a 1.2x1.2 so in a 2.4 you would have 4x I’m just wondering if 2x of these would be a huge difference from my 4r I wouldn’t expect it to be twice the yield but it would kinda have to add half or it wouldn’t be worth the extra cost of light and the extra 250w of energy.
Do you have 1 x 4R ? If so , 2 of these is far superior and you would expect to double the yield from 1 x 4R
Yes currently got a 4r in there wow interesting that’s food for thought double yield would be nice.
The 4R is only 240w output so youd be doubling your light.
These users thanked the author Invisible Sun for the post:
IMO (Wed Jun 23, 2021 8:12 pm)

Inactive account
Inactive Account
Posts: 55532
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:46 pm
Location: floating on a pink cloud
Has thanked: 23854 times
Been thanked: 18678 times
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Invisible Sun feed

Post by Inactive account »

Image
These users thanked the author Inactive account for the post (total 2):
IMO (Wed Jun 23, 2021 8:12 pm) • Invisible Sun (Sun Jun 27, 2021 9:31 am)

User avatar
IMO
Known User
Posts: 2893
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2020 8:01 am
Location: Northwest Uk
Has thanked: 2241 times
Been thanked: 2821 times
Status: Offline

Re: Invisible Sun feed

Post by IMO »

Invisible Sun wrote:
Wed Jun 23, 2021 7:57 pm
IMO wrote:
Wed Jun 23, 2021 6:01 pm
Invisible Sun wrote:
Wed Jun 23, 2021 5:49 pm


Do you have 1 x 4R ? If so , 2 of these is far superior and you would expect to double the yield from 1 x 4R
Yes currently got a 4r in there wow interesting that’s food for thought double yield would be nice.
The 4R is only 240w output so youd be doubling your light.
Aye I know bud

User avatar
Invisible Sun
Posts: 746
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 12:19 am
Has thanked: 333 times
Been thanked: 972 times
Contact:
Status: Offline

Re: Invisible Sun feed

Post by Invisible Sun »

Image

Happy Sunday everyone
These users thanked the author Invisible Sun for the post:
TheCloudyChef (Sun Jun 27, 2021 9:33 am)

Post Reply

Return to “Invisible Sun LED”